<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
         xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
         xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
         xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/">




    



<channel rdf:about="http://pacificrivers.org/protection-defense/legal-case/forests/RSS">
  <title>Forests</title>
  <link>http://pacificrivers.org</link>
  
  <description>
    
       Legal Cases related to forests
       
  </description>
  
  
  
            <syn:updatePeriod>daily</syn:updatePeriod>
            <syn:updateFrequency>1</syn:updateFrequency>
            <syn:updateBase>2008-11-20T23:48:15Z</syn:updateBase>
        
  
  <image rdf:resource="http://pacificrivers.org/logo.gif"/>

  <items>
    <rdf:Seq>
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pacificrivers.org/protection-defense/legal-case/preventing-the-resurrection-of-wopr"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pacificrivers.org/protection-defense/legal-case/reinstating-roadless-rule"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pacificrivers.org/protection-defense/legal-case/rock-creek-alliance-v.-usfws"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pacificrivers.org/protection-defense/legal-case/appeal-regulations"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pacificrivers.org/protection-defense/legal-case/defending-roadless-rule"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pacificrivers.org/protection-defense/legal-case/prc-lawsuit-to-protect-sierra-nevada"/>
        
    </rdf:Seq>
  </items>

</channel>

    <item rdf:about="http://pacificrivers.org/protection-defense/legal-case/preventing-the-resurrection-of-wopr">        <title>Preventing the Resurrection of WOPR</title>        <link>http://pacificrivers.org/protection-defense/legal-case/preventing-the-resurrection-of-wopr</link>        <description>Members of the timber industry are seeking to resurrect WOPR, despite the fact that the Obama administration withdrew the plan as legally indefensible.  PRC moved to intervene in this case to ensure that the aquatic protections of the Northwest Forest Plan remain in place on BLM forests in Western Oregon.</description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>lauren</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                <dc:date>2010-03-16T23:18:05Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>Legal Case</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://pacificrivers.org/protection-defense/legal-case/reinstating-roadless-rule">        <title>Reinstating the Roadless Rule</title>        <link>http://pacificrivers.org/protection-defense/legal-case/reinstating-roadless-rule</link>        <description>The Forest Service's repeal of the 2001 Roadless Rule was illegal.  Through both this case, and through our intervention in the case brought by Wyoming, PRC is working to continue to protect roadless areas, and the sensitive species that depend on them through the Roadless Rule.</description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>bwright</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                <dc:date>2009-08-06T20:38:30Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>Legal Case</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://pacificrivers.org/protection-defense/legal-case/rock-creek-alliance-v.-usfws">        <title>Protecting Bull Trout from Rock Creek Mine</title>        <link>http://pacificrivers.org/protection-defense/legal-case/rock-creek-alliance-v.-usfws</link>        <description>PRC brought this lawsuit under the Endangered Species Act to ensure that the Rock Creek Mine in Montana will not jeopardize bull trout and that any adverse impacts will be avoided or mitigated.</description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>bwright</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                <dc:date>2010-06-23T03:57:22Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>Legal Case</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://pacificrivers.org/protection-defense/legal-case/appeal-regulations">        <title>Defending the Public's Right to Comment and Appeal</title>        <link>http://pacificrivers.org/protection-defense/legal-case/appeal-regulations</link>        <description>In 2003, the Bush Administration adopted regulations that limited the rights of the public to comment on and to appeal Forest Service projects.  PRC stepped in to ensure that the public is given a voice in Forest Service decisions.  Public notice and comment opportunities allow the public to influence projects happening on public lands.</description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>bwright</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                <dc:date>2010-06-11T04:12:47Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>Legal Case</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://pacificrivers.org/protection-defense/legal-case/defending-roadless-rule">        <title>Defending the 2001 Roadless Rule</title>        <link>http://pacificrivers.org/protection-defense/legal-case/defending-roadless-rule</link>        <description>The Roadless Area Conservation Rule, adopted in 2001 with unprecedented public support, put severe limits on new road construction and logging in nearly 60 million acres of currently roadless forestlands.  The State of Wyoming, however, is seeking to overturn the rule nationwide to allow more roadbuilding in our National Forests.</description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>bwright</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                <dc:date>2009-08-17T17:56:06Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>Legal Case</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://pacificrivers.org/protection-defense/legal-case/prc-lawsuit-to-protect-sierra-nevada">        <title>Protecting Sierra Nevada’s Fragile Watersheds </title>        <link>http://pacificrivers.org/protection-defense/legal-case/prc-lawsuit-to-protect-sierra-nevada</link>        <description>For many years the Pacific Rivers Council has worked diligently with the Forest Service, independent scientists, and fellow conservationists to ensure that watersheds in the Sierra Nevada are managed in an ecologically sound manner.</description>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>kelleyb</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                <dc:date>2009-08-06T20:32:18Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>Legal Case</dc:type>    </item>




</rdf:RDF>
